3.9 Article

A nonclassical estrogen membrane receptor triggers rapid differential actions in the endocrine pancreas

期刊

MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 497-505

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/me.16.3.497

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucose homeostasis in blood is mainly maintained by insulin released from beta-cells and glucagon released from alpha-cells, both integrated within the pancreatic islet of Langerhans. The secretory processes in both types of cells are triggered by a rise in intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+](i)). In this study, rapid effects of the natural hormone E2 on [Ca2+](i) were studied in both types of cells within Intact islets using laser scanning confocal microscopy. alpha- And beta-cells showed opposite [Ca2+](i) responses when stimulated with physiological concentrations of 17beta-E2. Although the estrogen produced an increase in the frequency of glucose-induced [Ca2+](i) oscillations in insulin-releasing beta-cells, it prevented the low glucose-induced [Ca2+](i) oscillations in glucagon-releasing alpha-cells. The effects of 17beta-E2 on alpha-cells were mimicked by the cGMP permeable analog 8bromo-cGMP and blocked by the cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) inhibitor KT5823. Evidence indicated that these were membrane actions mediated by a non-classical ER. Both effects were rapid in onset and were reproduced by 17beta-E2 linked to horseradish peroxidase, a cell-impermeable molecule. Furthermore, these actions were not blocked by the specific ER blocker ICI 182,780. Competition studies performed with 17beta-E2 linked to horseradish peroxidase binding in a-cells supported the idea that the membrane receptor involved is neither ERalpha nor ERbeta. Additionally, the binding site was shared by the neurotransmitters epinephrine, norepinephrine, and dopamine and had the same pharmacological profile as the receptor previously described for beta-cells. Therefore, rapid estrogen actions in islet cells are initiated by a nonclassical estrogen membrane receptor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据