4.7 Article

The contribution of haploids, diploids and clones to fine-scale population structure in the seaweed Cladophoropsis membranacea (Chlorophyta)

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 329-345

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01448.x

关键词

alga; clonality; dispersal; isomorphic diplohaplontic life history; microsatellites; population genetic structure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Local populations of Cladophoropsis membranacea exist as mats of coalesced thalli composed of free-living haploid and diploid plants including clonally reproduced plants of either phase. None of the phases are morphologically distinguishable. We used eight microsatellite loci to explore clonality and fine-scale patch structure in C. membranacea at six sites on the Canary Islands. Mats were always composites of many individuals; not single, large clones. Haploids outnumbered diploids at all sites (from 2:1 to 10:1). In both haploid and diploid plants, genetic diversity was high and there was no significant difference in allele frequencies. Significant heterozygote deficiencies were found in the diploid plants at five out of six sites and linkage disequilibrium was associated with the haploid phase at all sites. Short dispersal distances of gametes/spores and small effective population sizes associated with clonality probably contribute to inbreeding. Spatial autocorrelation analysis revealed that most clones were found within a radius of approximate to 60 cm and rarely further than 5 m. Dominance of the haploid phase may reflect seasonal shifts in the relative frequencies of haploids and diploids, but may alternatively reflect superiority of locally adapted and competitively dominant, haploid clones; a strategy that is theoretically favoured in disturbed environments. Although sexual reproduction may be infrequent in C. membranacea, it is sufficient to maintain both life history phases and supports theoretical modelling studies that show that haploid-diploid life histories are an evolutionarily stable strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据