4.5 Article

Spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatal intensive unit associated with understaffing, overcrowding and mixing of patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 18-24

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1053/jhin.2001.1128

关键词

nosocomial infection; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA; neonatal intensive care unit; understaffing; overcrowding; mix of patients; economy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the period May-June 1999, an outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was registered in eight newborns in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at the Department of Pediatrics, Ulleval University Hospital (UUH) in Oslo. Seven were infected or colonized with an indistinguishable strain, detected at the NICU, and one patient with a slightly different PFGE type (i.e. a subtype) was registered at the outpatient clinic. The MRSA strains resembled the sensitive, inbred `Norwegian type' described four years earlier at UUH, showing a relatively low and heterogenic methicillin resistance (MIC 12-96 mg/L), and susceptibility to most other anti-staphylococcal agents. Before and during the outbreak, there was high activity, understaffing, overcrowding and a mix of patients; 42% of the staff were relatively untrained, and up to 62% (during weekends) were extra nursing staff, partly from other Scandinavian countries. All cases were isolated (air and contact isolation), and all other patients and personnel were treated as being exposed to MRSA (isolated from other departments) until the last patient had been identified, disinfection of all rooms was complete, and all screening samples from staff and other patients were negative. The NICU and the delivery suite were closed for one week for disinfection and screening. The outbreak ended after 34 days. Since then, two years later, no further cases have been detected in the NICU or the delivery suite. (C) 2001 The Hospital Infection Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据