4.7 Review

The effect of spatial and temporal information on saccades and neural activity in oculomotor structures

期刊

BRAIN
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 123-139

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf005

关键词

saccades; predictability; frontal eye fields; supplementary eye fields; basal ganglia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has been argued that saccade generation is supported by two systems, a 'where' system that decides the direction and extent of an impending saccade, and a 'when' system that is involved in the timing of the release of fixation. We evaluated the contributions of these systems to saccade latencies, and used functional MRI to identify the neural substrates of these systems. We found that advance knowledge of the direction and the timing of an impending target movement had both overlapping and discrete effects on saccade latencies and on neural activation. Knowledge of either factor decreased regular saccade latencies. However, knowledge of target direction increased the number of predictive and express saccades while knowledge of target timing did not. The brain activation data showed that advance knowledge of the direction or the timing of the target movement activated primarily overlapping structures. The precentral gyrus, in the region of the frontal eye fields, was more active in conditions in which some aspect of the target movement was predictable than in saccade control and fixation conditions. In the basal ganglia, activation discriminated between advance knowledge of target timing and target direction. The lenticular nuclei were more active when only target timing was known in advance, while the caudate was more active when only target direction was known in advance. These data suggest that the neural structures supporting the 'where' and 'when' systems are highly overlapping, although there is some dissociation subcortically. Knowledge of target timing and target direction converge in precentral gyrus, a region where there is strong evidence of context-dependent modulation of neural activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据