4.5 Article

IRF4 regulates IL-10 gene expression in CD4(+) T cells through differential nuclear translocation

期刊

CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 268, 期 2, 页码 97-104

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2011.02.008

关键词

Gene regulation; Interleukin-10 (IL-10); Interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4); Th1/Th2 cells

资金

  1. Mid-career Researcher Program [2009-0079438]
  2. Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs [A080588-20]
  3. GIST

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CD4(+) T cells play critical roles in the generation of protective immunity against a variety of pathogens. The main two types of effector CD4(+) T cells, Th1 and Th2 are characterized by their ability to produce signature cytokines. Among them, IL-10 is a multi-functional cytokine that plays a crucial role in maintaining the balance between immunity and tolerance. Although IL-10 is produced by both differentiated primary Th1 and Th2 cells, Th2 cells produce much higher levels of IL-10 upon stimulation. However, little information is available on the molecular mechanisms of IL-10 gene regulation at the transcriptional level. Interferon regulatory factor IRF4 is a member of the IRF family of transcription factors and plays critical roles in the development of CD4(+) T cells into Th2 cells. In this present study, we elucidate the underlying mechanism of IRF4 mediated IL-10 gene transcription in primary CD4(+) T cells. Th2 specific binding of IRF4 to the IRF4 responsive elements in IL-10 locus potentiated IL-10 expression in Th2 cells. Knockdown of IRF4 by siRNA decreased IL-10 expression level in Th2 cells. Nuclear translocation of IRF4 was much higher in Th2 cells upon stimulation, which contribute to maintain IL-10(high) phenotype of Th2 cells. Collectively, our results suggest that stimulation driven quantitative differences of IRF4 in the nucleus and its binding to IL-10 regulatory elements are crucial mechanisms to induce IL-10(high) gene expression in Th2 cells. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据