4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Assessing Behavioural Effects of Chronic HPA Axis Activation Using Conditional CRH-Overexpressing Mice

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 815-828

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10571-011-9784-0

关键词

Corticotropin-releasing hormone; Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis; Mouse model; Overexpression; Anxiety-related behaviour; Stress-coping

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung [Forderkennzeichen: 01GS08151, 01GS08155]
  2. Helmholtz Association [HA-215]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and its cognate receptors have been implicated in the pathophysiology of stress-related disorders. Hypersecretion of central CRH and elevated glucocorticoid levels, as a consequence of impaired feedback control, have been shown to accompany mood and anxiety disorders. However, a clear discrimination of direct effects of centrally hypersecreted CRH from those resulting from HPA axis activation has been difficult. Applying a conditional strategy, we have generated two conditional CRH-overexpressing mouse lines: CRH-COE (Del) mice overexpress CRH throughout the body, while CRH-COE (APit) mice selectively overexpress CRH in the anterior and intermediate lobe of the pituitary. Both mouse lines show increased basal plasma corticosterone levels and consequently develop signs of Cushing's syndrome. However, while mice ubiquitously overexpressing CRH exhibited increased anxiety-related behaviour, overexpression of CRH in the pituitary did not produce alterations in emotional behaviour. These results suggest that chronic hypercorticosteroidism alone is not sufficient to alter anxiety-related behaviour but rather that central CRH hyperdrive on its own or in combination with elevated glucocorticoids is responsible for the increase in anxiety-related behaviour. In conclusion, the generated mouse lines represent valuable animal models to study the consequences of chronic CRH overproduction and HPA axis activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据