4.5 Article

Transient Forebrain Ischemia Impact on Lymphocyte DNA Damage, Glutamic Acid Level, and SOD Activity in Blood

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 6-7, 页码 887-894

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10571-009-9371-9

关键词

Cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury; DNA damage; Lymphocyte; Glutamate level; Superoxide dismutase; Plasma; Blood cell

资金

  1. Slovak Grant Agency for Science [VEGA 2/6211/26, VEGA 2/6210/26, VEGA 2/0146/09, APVV LPP-023506]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Brain ischemia-reperfusion injury remains incompletely understood but appears to involve a complex series of interrelated biochemical pathways caused mainly by a burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS). In the present work we studied the impact of postischemic condition in the early phase of reperfusion on plasma and blood cells. Methods Transient forebrain ischemia was induced in Wistar rats by four-vessel occlusion model. Blood samples collected during postischemic reperfusion 20, 40, 60, 90, and 120 min after ischemia were used for assessing breaks of lymphocyte DNA, fluorimetric measurement of whole blood glutamate concentration, and spectrophotometrical determination of SOD activity in plasma and blood cells. Results Our results showed the most interesting changes of all observed parameters mainly at 40 and 120 min of reperfusion, when we observed peak DNA damage of lymphocytes and highest glutamate level and total and Cu/Zn SOD activity. At those time points, Mn SOD activity was low in plasma, as well as in blood cells. On the contrary, at 60 and 90 min, all studied parameters were approximately at the level of control. Conclusion Ischemia/reperfusion injury has influence on blood cells and has at least two waves of impact on DNA damage of peripheral lymphocytes, affects activity of major antioxidant enzymes SODs, as well as blood glutamic acid level. Elevation of Mn SOD activity probably plays an important role in the processes of elimination of postischemic damage in blood cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据