4.5 Article

Detachment of Brain Pericytes from the Basal Lamina is Involved in Disruption of the Blood-Brain Barrier Caused by Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Sepsis in Mice

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 309-316

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10571-008-9322-x

关键词

Blood-brain barrier; Brain pericytes; Basal lamina; Microglia; Lipopolysaccharide; Inflammation

资金

  1. JSPS, Japan [18890227, 17390159, 19790199]
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan [H19nanchi- ippan-006]
  3. Nakatomi Foundation and Research Foundation ITSUU Laboratory
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17390159, 18890227, 19790199] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is highly restrictive of the transport of substances between blood and the central nervous system. Brain pericytes are one of the important cellular constituents of the BBB and are multifunctional, polymorphic cells that lie within the microvessel basal lamina. The present study aimed to evaluate the role of pericytes in the mediation of BBB disruption using a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced model of septic encephalopathy in mice. ICR mice were injected intraperitoneally with LPS or saline and were sacrificed at 1, 3, 6, and 24 h after injection. Sodium fluorescein accumulated with time in the hippocampus after LPS injection; this hyperpermeability was supported by detecting the extravasation of fibrinogen. Microglia were activated and the number of microglia increased with time after LPS injection. LPS-treated mice exhibited a broken basal lamina and pericyte detachment from the basal lamina at 6-24 h after LPS injection. The disorganization in the pericyte and basal lamina unit was well correlated with increased microglial activation and increased cerebrovascular permeability in LPS-treated mice. These findings suggest that pericyte detachment and microglial activation may be involved in the mediation of BBB disruption due to inflammatory responses in the damaged brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据