4.0 Article

Acute behavioral and physiological effects of modafinil in drug abusers

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 105-115

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00008877-200203000-00002

关键词

modafinil; cocaine; stimulants; human; performance; abuse potential; self-reported drug effects; drug abuse

资金

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR002602] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA010325] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR02602] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDA NIH HHS [DA 10325] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modafinil, a novel stimulant, is effective in the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness associated with narcolepsy. It is biochemically and pharmacologically distinct from prototypical stimulants such as D-amphetamine, cocaine, and methylphenidate. The present experiment was designed to assess the acute behavioral effects of oral modafinil, cocaine, and placebo in participants (n=9) with recent histories of cocaine use (i.e. positive urine for cocaine or benzoylecgonine during the initial screening interview). Drug effects were assessed with a battery of self-reported drug-effect questionnaires, performance measures, and physiological indices. Cocaine, but not modafinil, produced stimulant-like self-reported drug effects (e.g. increased ratings of High and Stimulated). Modafinil and cocaine dose-dependently increased heart rate and blood pressure. The results of the present study suggest that modafinil has minimal abuse potential, but should be viewed cautiously because of the relatively small sample size. Future studies should further characterize the abuse potential of modafinil using other behavioral arrangements, such as drug discrimination or drug self-administration. A full characterization of the abuse potential of modafinil will become important as the use of this drug increases. (C) 2002 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据