4.5 Article

The effect of drought on plant water use efficiency of nine NAD-ME and nine NADP-ME Australian C-4 grasses

期刊

FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 11, 页码 1337-1348

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/FP02056

关键词

C-4 photosynthesis; drought; water use efficiency; delta C-13; delta O-18

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the response to drought of nine NAD-malic enzyme (NAD-ME) and nine NADP-malic enzyme (NADP-ME) C-4 grasses. Species were grown from seeds in potted soil in a glasshouse. Seedlings were either watered regularly or exposed to two successive drying cycles of 8-10 d each, after which plants were harvested. Under well-watered conditions, average water use efficiency (WUE; dry mass gain per unit water transpired) was similar for NAD-ME and NADP-ME C-4 grasses, and ranged between 6.0 and 8.7 g dry mass kg(-1) H2O. Drought enhanced WUE of most species, but to a significantly greater extent in NAD-ME (1.20-fold) than NADP-ME (1.11-fold) grasses. Inhibition of dry matter accumulation (average of 12%) and shoot elongation under drought was similar among the C-4 grasses. Leaf dry matter carbon (delta(13)C) and oxygen (delta(18)O) isotope compositions were significantly different between the two C-4 subtypes. Leaf delta(13)C averaged -13.3 and -12.2parts per thousand, and leaf delta(18)O averaged 26.0 and 26.9parts per thousand in well-watered NAD-ME and NADP-ME grasses, respectively. Drought significantly reduced leaf delta(13)C in most C-4 grasses by an average 0.5parts per thousand. Leaf delta(18)O was not significantly affected by drought, indicating that leaf delta(18)O does not reflect drought-induced changes in leaf transpiration of C-4 grasses. In the experiment reported here, NAD-ME grasses increased their WUE under drought to a greater extent than their NADP-ME counterparts. Increased WUE of the C-4 grasses under drought was primarily related to control of water loss relative to carbon gain at the leaf, rather than the plant, level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据