4.7 Review

γδ T-APCs: a novel tool for immunotherapy?

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
卷 68, 期 14, 页码 2443-2452

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-011-0706-6

关键词

Antigen presentation; gamma delta T cells; alpha beta T cells; Dendritic cells; Chemokines; Cytokines; Immunotherapy; Cancer

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation
  2. European FP6 (MAIN-NoE, INNOCHEM)
  3. Welsh Office for Research and Development
  4. Wellcome Trust
  5. Cancer Research UK
  6. Breast Cancer Campaign
  7. Baxter Healthcare
  8. Cardiff University [i3-IRG]
  9. Royal Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The series of seminal articles in this book clearly illustrate the multi-functional nature of gamma delta T cells. Some of the functions correlate with the tissue tropism of distinct gamma delta T cell subsets whereas others appear to result from oligoclonal selection. Here, we discuss the antigen-presenting cell (APC) function of the major subset of circulating gamma delta T cells, V gamma 9/V delta 2 T cells, present in human blood. During tissue culture, V gamma 9/V delta 2 T cells uniformly respond to a class of non-peptide antigens, so-called prenyl pyrophosphates, derived from stressed host cells or from microbes. It is this feature that distinguishes human (and primate) V gamma 9/V delta 2 T cells from alpha beta and gamma delta T cells of all other species and that forms the basis for detailed studies of human V gamma 9/V delta 2 T cells. One of the consequences of V gamma 9/V delta 2 T cell activation is the rapid acquisition of APC characteristics (gamma delta T-APCs) reminiscent of mature dendritic cells (DCs). In the following discussion, we will discriminate between the potential use of gamma delta T-APCs as a cellular vaccine in immunotherapy and their role in anti-microbial immunity. Exploiting the APC function in gamma delta T-APCs represents a true novelty in current immunotherapy research and may lead to effective, anti-tumor immunity in cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据