4.3 Article

Analysis of northern distribution of Aedes albopictus (Diptera : Culicidae) in Japan by geographical information system

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 4-11

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1603/0022-2585-39.1.4

关键词

Aedes albopictus; northern distribution; geographical information system; annual mean temperature; Tohoku district; Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aedes albopictus (Skuse), a mosquito vector of the dengue fever virus, is prevalent in Japan, distributed widely in Honshu Island with its northern limits between latitude 38degrees to 40degreesdegrees north. The factors affecting distribution of the species in the northern part of Japan were studied using the geographical information system (GIS). During 1998-2000, larval surveillance was carried out in 26 urban and rural areas in the Tohoku district, in the northern part of Honshu Island, by collecting larvae from artificial and natural habitats. Climatological analysis, using the GIS, showed that the following conditions accounted for the current distribution of Ae. albopictus: an annual mean temperature higher than 11degreesC and a mean temperature of the coldest month, January, higher than -2degreesC. A period with temperature above 11degreesC in the confirmed area of the mosquito successively continues for more than 186 d per year. The accumulated temperature calculated from a temperature of 11degreesC, which may be close to the developmental zero of Ae. albopictus, was over 1,350 degree-days. The relationship between the beginning of short-daylength, inducing egg diapause, and the monthly mean temperature during September and October necessary for successful larval development in the Tohoku district is also discussed. We also show the relationship between the current distribution of Ae. albopictus and the annual mean temperature in the United States. From these results it is predicted that Ae. albpictus will be established in some cities in northeast United States.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据