4.6 Article

Reliability and validity of comprehensive health status measures in children: The Child Health Questionnaire in relation to the Health Utilities Index

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 55, 期 1, 页码 67-76

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00411-5

关键词

health status indicators; quality of life; validity; reproducibility; Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ, CHQ-PF50); Health Utilities Index (HUI, HUI2)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assesses the feasibility, reliability and validity of the Child Health Questionnaire-Parent Form (CHQ-PF50), consisting of I I multi-item scales covering the physical, emotional and social well-being of children. The Health Utilities Index mark 2 (HU12) was selected for comparison. Parents of 467 Dutch schoolchildren (age 5-13) were sent CHQ and HUI questionnaires. A subgroup of 79 parents of children aged 10-11 were sent a retest after 2 weeks. Feasibility: 78% response with few missing/non-unique CHQ-answers (<1%). Internal consistency: Cronbach's alphas of .39-96 (mean .72). Item-own scale correlations were higher than item-other scale correlations. Test-retest ICCs were statistically significant for all but two CHQ scales (ICCs .31-84). Test-retest CHQ-scale means did not show statistically significant differences except for one scale (Behavior). Validity: the CHQ-scales, with one exception, correlated better with predefined parallel HUI domains (ICCs .26-53), than with non-parallel domains. Six CHQ scales discriminated clearly between children with and without chronic conditions and three scales discriminated between high and low medical consumption. This was at least equivalent to the discriminative ability of the HU12 in this study. Additional studies of test-retest reliability and responsiveness to change of the CHQ in varied populations are needed. From the present study and literature data on other (clinical) populations we conclude that psychometric properties of CHQ-based health status measurement justify application in pediatric outcome studies, in addition to clinical measures. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据