4.5 Article

Sorption and distribution of adsorbed metals in three soils of India

期刊

APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY
卷 18, 期 11, 页码 1723-1731

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-2927(03)00080-5

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mobility and bioavailability of heavy metals depends on the metal retention capacity of soil and also on the geochemical phases with which metals are associated. Laboratory batch experiments were carried out to study the sorption and distribution of Cd, Ni and Pb in 3 soils differing in their physicochemical properties from India: Oxyaquic Haplustalf (SL1), Typic Haplustalf (SL2) and Typic Haplustert (SL3). The heavy metal adsorption was studied by isotherms and the distribution coefficient (K-D) for each metal was obtained from the linear regressions of the concentration of metal remaining in equilibrium solution and the amount adsorbed. In general, the sorption capacity for all the metals decreased in the order: SL3>SL2>SL1. Among metals, the sorption capacity in all the soils decreased in the order: Pb>>Ni>Cd. Distribution of sorbed metals at various equilibrating concentrations was studied by sequential extraction. Results showed significant differences in the distribution of metals in these soils. At higher additions (such as 200 muM l(-1)) most of the metals were extracted in their more mobile fractions, exchangeable and/or inorganic in contrast to their original partitioning in soils, where they were preferentially associated with the less mobile residual fraction. Largest percentages of metals extracted in the exchangeable fraction corresponded to those soil-metal systems with smaller K-D values, e.g. Cd, Ni and Pb in SL1 and Cd and Ni in SL2. In neutral and alkaline soils (SL2, pH = 7.1, and SL3, pH = 8.6) Pb was predominantly extracted from the inorganic fractions and this corresponded to higher K-D values for Pb in these soils. The predominance of metals associated with the exchangeable fraction together with low K-D values indicates higher mobility of metals retained in the acidic soil (SL1, pH=5.2) compared with the others. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据