4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Phenomenology of tics and natural history of tic disorders

期刊

BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT
卷 25, 期 -, 页码 S24-S28

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0387-7604(03)90004-0

关键词

Tourette's syndrome; tics; premonitory urges; attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder; obsessive-compulsive disorder

资金

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [P01HD003008] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR006022] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [T32MH018268, P01MH049351] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR06022] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NICHD NIH HHS [P01 HD03008] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIMH NIH HHS [P01 MH49351, T32 MH18268] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tic symptoms, the hallmark of Tourette's syndrome (TS), may simply be fragments of innate behavior. As such, the sensory urges that precede tics may illuminate some of the normal internal cues that are intimately involved in the assembly of behavioral sequences. The occurrence of tics in time appears to have fractal characteristics that may help to explain the waxing and waning course of tic disorders. Longitudinal studies are currently underway that should permit a close examination of the natural fluctuations in tic severity using valid and reliable clinician-rated scales of tic severity. The natural history of tics typically shows a marked decline during the course of adolescence. However, TS can also be associated with social, emotional, and academic difficulties in early adulthood. Comorbid attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder are likely to influence the long-term adaptive outcomes of individuals with TS. Future progress may also be expected as endophenotypes, and possibly genetic markers, are identified that are associated with specific comorbid conditions and etiologically distinct forms of TS. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据