4.5 Article

Gene expression of glutamate receptors GluR1 and NR1 is differentially modulated in striatal neurons in rats after 6-hydroxydopamine lesion

期刊

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
卷 43, 期 7, 页码 639-653

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0197-0186(03)00080-9

关键词

rat model of Parkinson's disease; etiology; basal ganglia; medium spiny neurons; striatal interneurons; ionotropic glutamate receptors; motor symptoms

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, we attempted to address the modulation of the gene expression of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and alpha-amino-3hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate (AMPA) glutamate receptors in the neostriatum of the 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-lesioned rat, an animal model of Parkinson's disease. After 2 weeks of lesion, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCRs) revealed significant reduction in GluR1 mRNA expression but a significant enhancement of NR1 mRNA expression in the striatal tissues of the lesioned side. No modulation in the mRNA expression of GluR2, GluR3, GluR4 and NR2B were found. Immunofluorescence with digital imaging analysis also demonstrated a significant reduction in GluR1 immunoreactivity in the lesioned neostriatum. Interestingly, the reduction in GluR1 immunoreactivity was primarily observed in presumed striatal medium spiny neurons but not in parvalbumin-labeled striatal GABAergic interneurons. Immunoreactivity for GluR2, GluR2/3, GluR4, NR1 and NR2B was unchanged in neurons of the neostriatum of the lesioned side. The present results indicate that there is an opposite trend in modulation in the gene expressions of GluR1 and NR1 in the neostriatum of 6-OHDA-lesioned rats after dopamine denervation. Modulation of GluR1 mRNA and immunoreactivity is likely to be limited in the striatal projection neurons. These findings have implications for the use of NMDA and AMPA receptor antagonists in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据