4.7 Article

Persistence of tumor-infiltrating CD8 T cells is tumor-dependent but antigen-independent

期刊

CELLULAR & MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 415-423

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cmi.2011.18

关键词

antigen; cytokines; tolerance; tumor-associated factors; tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [F31-AI080286, CA100875]
  2. UNCF-Merck
  3. NSF
  4. Singapore-MIT Alliance
  5. Koch Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

How tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) that are tumor-specific but functionally tolerant persist in the antigen-expressing tumor tissue is largely unknown. We have previously developed a modified TRansgenic Adenocarcinoma of the Mouse Prostate (TRAMP) model where prostate cancer cells express the T-cell epitope SIYRYYGL (SIY) recognized by CD8 T cells expressing the 2C T-cell receptor (TCR) (referred to as TRP-SIY mice). In TRP-SIY mice, activated 2C T cells rapidly become tolerant following infiltration into the prostate tumor. In this study, we show that tolerant 2C T cells persist in the prostate tumor of TRP-SIY mice by proliferating slowly in a tumor-dependent, but antigen-, interleukin (IL)-7- and IL-15-independent manner. We also show that disappearance of 2C T cells from the lymphoid organs of TRP-SIY mice are due to antigen-induced T-cell contraction rather than altered trafficking or generalized T-cell depletion in the mice. Finally, we show that clonal T cells unreactive to SIY are equally capable of persisting in the prostate tumor. These findings suggest that while functional tolerance of TILs is induced by antigen, persistence of tolerant TILs in the tumor tissue is mediated by a novel mechanism: slow proliferation independent of antigen and homeostatic cytokines. These results also allow CD8 T-cell survival in the tumor environment to be compared with T-cell survival in chronic infection. Cellular & Molecular Immunology (2011) 8, 415-423; doi:10.1038/cmi.2011.18; published online 13 June 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据