4.4 Article

Nanostructural features of demosponge biosilica

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
卷 144, 期 3, 页码 271-281

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2003.09.031

关键词

porifera; Tethya aurantia; spicules; silicatein; silicon; biomineralization; biomimetic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent interest in the optical and mechanical properties of silica structures made by living sponges, and the possibility of harnessing these mechanisms for the synthesis of advanced materials and devices, motivate our investigation of the nanoscale structure of these remarkable biomaterials. Scanning electron and atomic force microscopic (SEM and AFM) analyses of the annular substructure of demosponge biosilica spicules reveals that the deposited material is nanoparticulate, with a mean particle diameter of 74 +/- 13 nm. The nanoparticles are deposited in alternating layers with characteristic etchant reactivities. Further analyses of longitudinally fractured spicules indicate that each deposited layer is approximately monoparticulate in thickness and exhibits extensive long range ordering, revealing an unanticipated level of nanoscale structural complexity. NMR data obtained from differentially heated spicule samples suggest that the etch sensitivity exhibited by these annular domains may be related to variation in the degree of silica condensation, rather than variability in the inclusion of organics. In addition, AFM phase imaging in conjunction with results obtained from HE and alkaline etching experiments suggest that at various stages in spicule biosynthesis, regions of unusually low silica condensation are deposited, indicating a possible interruption in normal spicule formation. While this discovery of nanoparticulate silica aggregation in demosponge skeletal elements is likely to reflect the intrinsic kinetic tendency of silica to form such particles during polycondensation, the heirarchical organization of these nanoparticles is biologically unique. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据