4.5 Review

ADSC Therapy in Neurodegenerative Disorders

期刊

CELL TRANSPLANTATION
卷 23, 期 4-5, 页码 549-557

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.3727/096368914X678445

关键词

Neurodegenerative disorders; Adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs); Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Parkinson's disease; Alzheimer's disease; Huntington's disease; Autoimmune encephalomyelitis; Krabbe disease; Niemann-Pick disease; Friedreich's ataxia

资金

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China [NSC 102-2320-B-039-011]
  2. Taiwan Department of Health Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence [DOH102-TD-B-111-004]
  3. Aim for the Top University Plan of the National Chiao Tung University and Ministry of Education, Cancer Research Center of Excellence (Taiwan)
  4. Ministry of Economic Affairs [102-EC-17-A-19-I1-0051]
  5. Industry-Academy Cooperation Office [102426AB, MOHW103-TD-B-111-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurodegenerative disorders, chronic diseases that can severely affect the patient's daily life, include amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, and Huntington's diseases. However, these diseases all have the common characteristic that they are due to degenerative irreversibility, and thus no efficient drugs or therapy methods can mitigate symptoms completely. Stem cell therapy, such as adipose tissue-derived stem cells (ADSCs), is a promising treatment for incurable disorders. In this review, we summarized the previous studies using ADSCs to treat neurodegenerative disorders, as well as their therapeutic mechanisms. We also suggested possible expectations for future human clinical trials involving minimized intracerebroventricular combined with intravenous administration, using different cell lineages to finish complementary therapy as well as change the extracellular matrix to create a homing niche. Depending on successful experiments in relevant neurodegenerative disorders models, this could form the theoretical basis for future human clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据