4.5 Article

Repeated Administrations of Human Umbilical Cord Blood Cells Improve Disease Outcomes in a Mouse Model of Sanfilippo Syndrome Type III B

期刊

CELL TRANSPLANTATION
卷 23, 期 12, 页码 1613-1630

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.3727/096368914X676916

关键词

Cord blood; Mononuclear cells; Naglu enzyme; Behavior; Hippocampus; Microglia; Heparan sulfate

资金

  1. Children's Medical Research Foundation, Inc.
  2. International Organization of Glutaric Acidemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sanfilippo syndrome type In B (MPS III B) is an inherited disorder characterized by a deficiency of alpha-N-acetylglucosaminidase (Naglu) enzyme leading to accumulation of heparan sulfate in lysosomes and severe neurological deficits. We have previously shown that a single administration of human umbilical cord mononuclear cells (hUCB MNCs) into Naglu knockout mice decreased behavioral abnormalities and tissue pathology. In this study, we tested whether repeated doses of hUCB MNCs would be more beneficial than a single dose of cells. Naglu mice at 3 months of age were randomly assigned to either a Media-only group or one of three hUCB MNC treatment groups-single low dose (3 x 10(6) cells), single high dose (1.8 x 10(7) cells), or multiple doses (3 x 10(6) cells monthly for 6 months) delivered intravenously; cyclosporine was injected intraperitoneally to immune suppress the mice for the duration of the study. An additional control group of wild-type mice was also used. We measured anxiety in an open field test and cognition in an active avoidance test prior to treatment and then at monthly intervals for 6 months. hUCB MNCs restored normal anxiety-Re behavior in these mice (p < 0.001). The repeated cell administrations also restored hippocampal cytoarchitecture, protected the dendritic tree, decreased GM3 ganglioside accumulation, and decreased microglial activation, particularly in the hippocampus and cortex. These data suggest that the neuroprotective effect of hUCB MNCs can be enhanced by repeated cell administrations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据