4.7 Article

Rosiglitazone (PPAR gamma-agonist) attenuates atherogenesis with no effect on hyperglycaemia in a combined diabetes-atherosclerosis mouse model

期刊

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 45-50

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1463-1326.2003.00240.x

关键词

atherosclerosis; apolipoprotein E; low-dose streptozotocin; PPAR gamma; rosiglitazone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The administration of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) agonists to low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-receptor-deficient mice resulted in a reduction in the atherosclerotic lesion area in male mice, but not in female mice. The male mice also exhibited reduction in insulin resistance while the female mice did not. To further examine the relationship between PPARgamma agonists, insulin resistance and atherosclerosis, we used the model of accelerated atherosclerosis in male apolipoprotein E (apoE)-deficient mice rendered diabetic by low-dose streptozotocin (STZ). Methods: Male, apoE-deficient mice (n = 48) were randomly divided into four groups. To induce diabetes, two groups received low-dose STZ and two groups served as controls. After diabetes induction, rosiglitazone (a PPARgamma agonist) was administered by oral gavage to one of the diabetic and one of the non-diabetic groups. Results: Rosiglitazone reduced significantly the atherosclerotic aortic plaque area in both diabetic and non-diabetic apoE-deficient mice: 340 +/- 54 vs. 201 +/- 27 mumol(2) (p = 0.001) in diabetic mice; 243 +/- 22 vs. 158 +/- 27 mumol(2) (p = 0.001) in non-diabetic mice. Also, rosiglitazone reduced the correlation coefficient between plasma glucose and the degree of atherosclerosis (p < 0.0025) without affecting plasma glucose levels. The rosiglitazone-treated mice, both diabetic and non-diabetic, had higher lipid levels. Conclusions: Rosiglitazone-treated animals showed less atherosclerosis despite higher lipid levels and similar glucose levels. These data suggest a direct anti-atherogenic effect of rosiglitazone on the arterial wall.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据