4.5 Article

Bone Marrow Stromal Cell-Mediated Tissue Sparing Enhances Functional Repair After Spinal Cord Contusion in Adult Rats

期刊

CELL TRANSPLANTATION
卷 21, 期 7, 页码 1561-1575

出版社

COGNIZANT COMMUNICATION CORP
DOI: 10.3727/096368912X640484

关键词

Transplantation; Bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC); Neuroprotection; Locomotion; Gridwalk; Allodynia

资金

  1. LUMC [30229/5000]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [017.001.265]
  3. Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger
  4. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at the University of Pittsburgh

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) transplantation has shown promise for repair of the spinal cord. We showed earlier that a BMSC transplant limits the loss of spinal nervous tissue after a contusive injury. Here, we addressed the premise that BMSC-mediated tissue sparing underlies functional recovery in adult rats after a contusion of the thoracic spinal cord. Our results reveal that after 2 months BMSCs had elicited a significant increase in spared tissue volumes and in blood vessel density in the contusion epicenter. A strong functional relationship existed between spared tissue volumes and blood vessel density. BMSC-transplanted rats exhibited significant improvements in motor, sensorimotor, and sensory functions, which were strongly correlated with spared tissue volumes. Retrograde tracing revealed that rats with BMSCs had twice as many descending brainstem neurons with an axon projecting beyond the contused spinal cord segment and these correlated strongly with the improved motor/sensorimotor functions but not sensory functions. Together, our data indicate that tissue sparing greatly contributes to BMSC-mediated functional repair after spinal cord contusion. The preservation/formation of blood vessels and sparing/regeneration of descending brainstem axons may be important mediators of the BMSC-mediated anatomical and functional improvements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据