4.5 Article

Hepatocyte Transplantation Through the Hepatic Vein: A New Route of Cell Transplantation to the Liver

期刊

CELL TRANSPLANTATION
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 1259-1270

出版社

COGNIZANT COMMUNICATION CORP
DOI: 10.3727/096368910X547417

关键词

Hepatocyte transplantation; Hepatocyte function; Hepatic veins; Experimental transplantation

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) Japan [21300180]
  2. Bayer Hemophilia Award Program
  3. Public Trust Surgery Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficiency of hepatocyte transplantation into the liver varies with the method of administration. This study investigated whether retrograde infusion via the hepatic vein provides a sufficient number of donor cells for the liver. Donor hepatocytes were isolated from dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV+) rats and transplanted into DPPIV- rat livers either by antegrade portal vein infusion or retrograde hepatic vein infusion. Hepatocyte engraftment ratios and localization were evaluated by histological DPPIV enzymatic staining at 1 week and 8 weeks after the transplantation. No significant differences in engraftment efficiency were observed at either 1 week or 8 weeks after transplantation by either route. However, the localization of the transplanted hepatocytes differed with the administration route. Portal vein infusion resulted in predominantly periportal engraftment, whereas hepatic vein infusion led to pericentral zone engraftment. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the transplanted hepatocytes engrafted in the pericentral zone after retrograde infusion displayed intense CYP2E1 staining similar to the surrounding native hepatocytes. CYP2E1 staining was further enhanced by administration of isosafrole, an inducing agent for various cytochrome P450 enzymes, including CYP2E1. This study demonstrates a novel approach of transplanting hepatocytes into the liver through retrograde hepatic vein infusion as the means to target cell implantation to the pericentral zone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据