4.5 Article

Roles of cathepsins in reperfusion-induced apoptosis in cultured astrocytes

期刊

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
卷 42, 期 2, 页码 153-159

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0197-0186(02)00077-3

关键词

cathepsin; hydrogen peroxide (H2O2); apoptosis; caspase; astrocyte

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Astrocytic apoptosis may play a role in the central nervous system injury. We previously showed that reperfusion of cultured astrocytes with normal medium after exposure to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-containing medium causes apoptosis. This study examines the involvement of the lysosomal enzymes cathepsins B and D in the astrocytic apoptosis. Reperfusion after exposure to H2O2 caused a marked increase in caspase-3 and cathepsin D activities and a marked decrease in cathepsin B activity. Pepstatin A, an inhibitor of cathepsin D, and acetyl-L-aspartyl-L-methionyl-L-glutaminyl-L-aspart-l-aldehyde (Ac-DMQD-CHO), a specific inhibitor of caspase-3, blocked the H2O2-induced decrease in cell viability and DNA ladder formation in cultured rat astrocytes. The (L-3-trans-(propylcarbamoyl)oxirane-2-carbonyl)-L-isoleucyl-L-proline methyl ester (CA074 Me), a specific inhibitor of cathepsin B, did not affect the H2O2-induced cell injury. On the other hand, CA074 Me decreased cell viability with DNA ladder formation when cultured in the presence of Ac-DMQD-CHO. This caspase-independent apoptosis was attenuated by the addition of the cathepsin D inhibitor pepstatin A. Caspase-3 like activity was markedly inhibited by Ac-DMQD-CHO and partially by pepstatin A. Pepstatin A and CA074 Me inhibited cathepsin B and cathepsin D activities, respectively, in the presence and absence of Ac-DMQD-CHO. These results suggest that cathepsins B and D are involved in astrocytic apoptosis: cathepsin D acts as a death-inducing factor upstream of caspase-3 and the caspase-independent apoptosis is regulated antagonistically by cathepsins B and D. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据