4.3 Article

The effect of ketamine/xylazine anesthesia on sensory and motor evoked potentials in the rat

期刊

SPINAL CORD
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 16-22

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101400

关键词

MEP; SEP; electric stimulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study design: Experimental laboratory investigation of the effect of anesthesia on evoked potentials in rats. Objectives: To define the optimal ketamine/xylazine anesthesia levels for the recording of different evoked potentials. Setting: BioSurgery Preclinical Department, Baxter BioScience, Vienna, Austria. Methods: Rats were implanted with cranial screws that allow stimulation and recording of evoked potentials. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), brainstem-derived motor evoked potentials (BMEPs) and corticomotor evoked potential (CMEPs) were recorded under different levels of anesthesia. The recorded signals were evaluated by measuring their latencies and amplitudes. The level of anesthesia was assessed by scoring the hind limb withdrawal reflex. Results: All three signals showed a strong dependency on the level of anesthesia. The observed effects, however, differed between the three signals. SEP amplitudes and latencies declined as animals slowly transgressed from deep to light anesthesia. In contrast, BMEP amplitudes were larger and latencies shorter in light anesthesia than in deep anesthesia. CMEPs finally were hard to record under deep anesthesia, but were easily recorded in light anesthesia. BMEPs that were recorded during light anesthesia also showed a significant change in configuration that was coupled with a notable increase in the variability of its amplitudes. Conclusions: The level of ketamine/xylazine anesthesia affects evoked potentials and thus should be controlled during electrophysiological recording. Our results suggest that SEPs should be best recorded during deep anesthesia, while BMEPs and CMEPs are best recorded during intermediate and light anesthesia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据