4.0 Article

Chromosomes Rein Back the Spindle Pole Body during Horsetail Movement in Fission Yeast Meiosis

期刊

CELL STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
卷 39, 期 2, 页码 93-100

出版社

JAPAN SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1247/csf.14007

关键词

Schizosaccharomyces pombe; meiosis; telomere; spindle; microtubule

资金

  1. KAKENHI [22370074, 24770113, 25116006, 26251037]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26251037, 24770113, 22370074, 26116511, 26291007, 25116006] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In meiosis, pairing and recombination of homologous chromosomes are crucial for the correct segregation of chromosomes, and substantial movements of chromosomes are required to achieve homolog pairing. During this process, it is known that telomeres cluster to form a bouquet arrangement of chromosomes. The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe provides a striking example of bouquet formation, after which the entire nucleus oscillates between the cell poles (these oscillations are generally called horsetail nuclear movements) while the telomeres remain clustered to the spindle pole body (SPB; a centrosome-equivalent structure in fungi) at the leading edge of the moving nucleus. S. pombe mutants defective in telomere clustering frequently form aberrant spindles, such as monopolar or nonpolar spindles, leading to missegregation of the chromosomes at the subsequent meiotic divisions. Here we demonstrate that such defects in meiotic spindle formation caused by loss of meiotic telomere clustering are rescued when nuclear movement is prevented. On the other hand, stopping nuclear movement does not rescue defects in telomere clustering, nor chromosome missgregation even in cells that have formed a bipolar spindle. These results suggest that movement of the SPB without attachment of telomeres leads to the formation of aberrant spindles, but that recovering bipolar spindles is not sufficient for rescue of chromosome missegregation in mutants lacking telomere clustering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据