4.0 Article

Macrophage Recognition of Cells with Elevated Calcium Is Mediated by Carbohydrate Chains of CD43

期刊

CELL STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 43-54

出版社

JAPAN SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1247/csf.12024

关键词

elevated calcium; CD43; cytoskeleton; macrophage; nucleolin

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24659057] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macrophages remove deteriorating cells (those undergoing apoptosis and oxidation) via poly-N-acetyllactosaminyl chains on CD43 caps, a major cell-surface glycoprotein. Unusually high intracellular calcium levels are also deteriorating for cells and tissue. Here we artificially elevated calcium levels in cells and examined the mechanism by which this elevation was resolved by macrophages. Results showed that treatment with the calcium ionophore A23187 and ionomycin induces capping of CD43 on Jurkat cells, which are subsequently recognized and phagocytosed by macrophages, indicating that macrophages regard cells with elevated calcium as targets for removal. Further tests showed that A23187- and ionomycin-treated Jurkat cells did not induce apoptotic changes such as DNA fragmentation or phosphatidylserine expression, indicating that these cells were removed despite still being viable. Jurkat cells pretreated with anti-CD43 antibody or those with poly-N-acetyllactosaminyl chains containing oligosaccharides inhibited macrophage binding, indicating that macrophages recognize the poly-N-acetyllactosaminyl chains on CD43. Binding was also inhibited by treating macrophages with anti-nucleolin antibody, indicating that recognition occurs through nucleolin, a cell-surface receptor. Further, nucleolin-transfected HEK293 cells bound A23187-treated cells, and this binding was inhibited by in the presence of oligosaccharides. Taken together, these results show that elevated calcium levels induce CD43 capping, and macrophages remove the cells if their nucleolin receptors can bind to the poly-N-acetyllactosaminyl chains of capped CD43.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据