4.0 Article

Live Imaging of Protein Kinase Activities in Transgenic Mice Expressing FRET Biosensors

期刊

CELL STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 65-73

出版社

JAPAN SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1247/csf.11045

关键词

FRET; ERK; PKA; transgenic mouse; two-photon excitation microscopy

资金

  1. Research Program of Innovative Cell Biology Cell Innovation
  2. Innovative Techno-Hub for Integrated Medical Bio-imaging Project of the Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology
  3. [22113002]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22113001] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetically-encoded biosensors based on the principle of Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) have been widely used in biology to visualize the spatiotemporal dynamics of signaling molecules. Despite the increasing multitude of these biosensors, their application has been mostly limited to cultured cells with transient biosensor expression, due to particular difficulties in the development of transgenic mice that express FRET biosensors. In this study, we report the efficient generation of transgenic mouse lines expressing heritable and functional biosensors for ERK and PKA. These transgenic mice were created by the cytoplasmic co-injection of Tol2 transposase mRNA and a circular plasmid harbouring Tol2 recombination sites. High expression of the biosensors in a wide range of cell types allowed us to screen newborn mice simply by inspection. Observation of these transgenic mice by two-photon excitation microscopy yielded real-time activity maps of ERK and PKA in various tissues, with greatly improved signal-to-background ratios. Our transgenic mice may be bred into diverse genetic backgrounds; moreover, the protocol we have developed paves the way for the generation of transgenic mice that express other FRET biosensors, with important applications in the characterization of physiological and pathological signal transduction events in addition to drug development and screening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据