4.0 Article

Novel Cis-acting Element GASE Regulates Transcriptional Induction by the Golgi Stress Response

期刊

CELL STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 1-12

出版社

JAPAN SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1247/csf.10014

关键词

Golgi apparatus; Golgi stress response; ER stress response; unfolded protein response

资金

  1. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  2. Sankyo Foundation of Life Science
  3. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [21113511, 22370069, 22020019]
  5. MEXT
  6. Hyogo Prefecture Government
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22370069, 23657136] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When increased production of secretory proteins overwhelms the capacity of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi apparatus, eukaryotic cells expand their capacity to sustain secretory function. The capacity of the ER is enhanced by the mechanism called the ER stress response, but the mechanism regulating Golgi capacity (the Golgi stress response) has remained unclear. Here, we found that transcription of Golgi-related genes, including glycosylation enzymes as well as factors involved in post-Golgi vesicular transport and maintenance of Golgi structure, was upregulated upon treatment with monensin, an ionophore that disrupts the function of acidic organelles, including the Golgi apparatus and lysosomes by neutralizing their lumen. This transcriptional induction was found to be commonly regulated by a novel cis-acting element called the Golgi apparatus stress response element (GASE), whose consensus sequence is ACGTGgc. When the function of the Golgi apparatus was specifically disturbed by overexpression of GCP60, a Golgi-localized protein that binds to giantin, transcription from GASE was significantly induced. These results suggest that mammalian cells have the Golgi stress response, and that GASE regulates transcriptional induction involved in the Golgi stress response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据