4.3 Article

Short (GT) n repeats in heme oxygenase-1 gene promoter are associated with lower risk of coronary heart disease in subjects with high levels of oxidative stress

期刊

CELL STRESS & CHAPERONES
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 329-338

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12192-011-0309-z

关键词

Heme oxygenase-1; Oxidative stress; Malonaldehyde; Coronary heart disease; Gene polymorphism

资金

  1. National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [NSFC 30525031, 30711120579]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although (GT) (n) repeats in heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) promoter may modulate gene transcriptional activity, the association between (GT) (n) repeats polymorphism and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) from different levels of oxidative stress (OS) is unknown. We determined the allelic frequencies of (GT) (n) repeats in the HO-1 gene promoter and plasma malonaldehyde (MDA) as biomarkers of OS in 2,298 pairs of CHD patients and controls in the Chinese population. Furthermore, we measured MDA in culture mediums and HO-1 expressions levels in cell lysates of endothelial cells carrying various (GT) (n) genotypes under different concentrations of H2O2. Compared with L/L genotype (> 25 repeats) carriers, the adjusted odd ratios for S/S genotype (a parts per thousand currency sign25 repeats) in subjects with different levels of OS (MDA < 1.83, 1.83-2.91, > 2.91 mu mol/L) were 1.06 (95%CI, 0.75 to 1.49), 0.79 (95%CI, 0.55 to 1.12), and 0.60 (95%CI, 0.44 to 0.81), respectively (P (interaction) = 0.002). In biological experiments, compared with endothelial cells carrying L/L genotype, cells with S/S genotype did not have a significantly higher HO-1 expression under 0 mu mol/L H2O2, but displayed a significantly higher HO-1 expression under 50 mu mol/L H2O2 (P (interaction) = 0.003). S/S genotype in HO-1 gene promoter is associated with a lower risk of CHD in subjects with higher levels of OS, because under conditions of high OS, the S/S genotype has higher levels of HO-1, an antioxidant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据