4.3 Article

Myocardial Hsp70 phosphorylation and PKC-mediated cardioprotection following exercise

期刊

CELL STRESS & CHAPERONES
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 141-150

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12192-008-0065-x

关键词

Signal transduction; Rat; Heart; Treadmill running; Heat shock proteins

资金

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada [8170-05 RGPIN]
  2. Ontario Graduate Scholarships for Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both protein kinase C (PKC) activation and Hsp70 expression have been shown to be key components for exercise-mediated myocardial protection during ischemia-reperfusion injury. Given that Hsp70 has been shown to undergo inducible phosphorylation in striated muscle and liver, we hypothesized that PKC may regulate myocardial Hsp70 function and subsequent exercise-conferred cardioprotection through this phosphorylation. Hence, acute exercise of male Sprague-Dawley rats (30 m/min for 60 min at 2% grade) was employed to assess the role of PKC and its selected isoforms in phosphorylation of Hsp70 and protection of the myocardium during ischemia-reperfusion injury. It was observed that administration of the PKC inhibitor chelerythrine chloride (5 mg/kg) suppressed the activation of three exercise-induced PKC isoforms (PKC alpha, PKC delta, and PKCE >) and attenuated the exercise-mediated reduction of myocardial infarct size during ischemia-reperfusion injury. While this study also demonstrated that exercise led to an alteration in the phosphorylation status of Hsp70, this posttranslational modification appeared to be dissociated from PKC activation, as exercise-induced phosphorylation of Hsp70 was unchanged following inhibition of PKC. Taken together, these results indicate that selected isoforms of PKC play an important role in exercise-mediated protection of the myocardium during ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, exercise-induced phosphorylation of Hsp70 does not appear to be a mechanism by which PKC induces this cardioprotective effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据