4.4 Article

Glucocorticoids are necessary for enhancing the acquisition of associative memories after acute stressful experience

期刊

HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 124-131

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0018-506X(02)00025-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH059970-03, R01 MH059970-02, R01 MH059970] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [59970] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH059970] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to acute stressful experience can enhance the later ability to acquire new memories about associations between stimuli. This enhanced learning is observed during classical eyeblink conditioning of both hippocampal-dependent and -independent learning. It can be induced within minutes of the stressful event and persists for days. Here we examined the role of the major stress hormones glucocorticoids in the enhancement of learning after stress. In the first two experiments, it was determined that adrenalectomy (ADX), with and without replacement of basal levels of corticosterone, prevented the stress-induced enhancement of trace conditioning, a task that is dependent on the hippocampus for acquisition. In a third experiment, demedullation, which removes the adrenal medulla but leaves the adrenal cortex and corticosterone levels intact, did not affect the enhancement of learning after stress. In a fourth experiment, ADX prevented the stress-induced enhancement of delay conditioning, a hippocampal-independent task. In a final experiment, it was determined that one injection of stress levels of corticosterone enhanced new learning within minutes but not new learning 24 h later. Together these results suggest that endogenous glucocorticoids are necessary and sufficient for transiently enhancing acquisition of new associative memories and necessary but insufficient for persistently enhancing their acquisition after exposure to an acute stressful experience. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据