4.7 Article

Dynamic Analysis of Gene Expression and Genome-wide Transcription Factor Binding during Lineage Specification of Multipotent Progenitors

期刊

CELL STEM CELL
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 754-768

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.09.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. FCT [SFRH/BD/33208/2007]
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  4. National Medical Research Council [NMRC/STaR/0001/2008]
  5. NIH [HL112719]
  6. Medical Research Council UK
  7. EuroSyStem
  8. European Cancer Stem Cell Training, Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research
  9. UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  10. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/33208/2007] Funding Source: FCT
  11. MRC [MC_U137973817] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. Cancer Research UK [12796] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. Medical Research Council [MC_U137973817] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We used the paradigmatic GATA-PU.1 axis to explore, at the systems level, dynamic relationships between transcription factor (TF) binding and global gene expression programs as multipotent cells differentiate. We combined global ChIP-seq of GATA1, GATA2, and PU.1 with expression profiling during differentiation to erythroid and neutrophil lineages. Our analysis reveals (1) differential complexity of sequence motifs bound by GATA1, GATA2, and PU.1; (2) the scope and interplay of GATA1 and GATA2 programs within, and during transitions between, different cell compartments, and the extent of their hard-wiring by DNA motifs; (3) the potential to predict gene expression trajectories based on global associations between TF-binding data and target gene expression; and (4) how dynamic modeling of DNA-binding and gene expression data can be used to infer regulatory logic of TF circuitry. This rubric exemplifies the utility of this cross-platform resource for deconvoluting the complexity of transcriptional programs controlling stem/progenitor cell fate in hematopoiesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据