3.8 Article

Laboratory study on the survival of water hyacinth under several conditions of heavy metal concentrations

期刊

ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 321-334

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1093-0191(02)00002-3

关键词

water hyacinth; heavy metals; Egypt

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study the survival and behaviour of water hyacinth [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms] under varying conditions of heavy metal concentrations, groups of the plants were grown in different media (distilled water, Nile water, wastewater and different concentrations of heavy metals). Simultaneously, blank experiments were carried out for comparison. Visual-changes in the plants observed during. each experiment were noted. The heavy metal (Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn) concentrations, pH and conductivity of the media were measured before, during and at the termination of experiments. In addition, analyses for heavy metals were carried but on the plant samples after termination of the experiments to determine the effect of different media on metal accumulation by the plants-The results showed that water hyacinth can survive in a mixture of heavy metal concentrations up to 3 mg l(-1) and in 100 mg Pb l(-1) solution, whereas higher concentrations of metals as mixtures and 100 mg Cd l(-1) led to rapid fading of the plants. Water hyacinth exhibited a deprotonation reaction during the uptake of metal ions, which was detected as a. result of a decrease in pH of the growth media. The results indicated that water hyacinth plays an outstanding role as a heavy metal decontaminator; in addition, its role as a pollutant by releasing metal ions into the aquatic environment was also noted. Elevated pH and ammonia concentrations, along with the low dissolved oxygen content in the microenvironment around the root hairs, are suggested as the main factors for the rapid wilting of plants growing in Kima drain wastewater. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据