4.8 Review

Determinants of public T cell responses

期刊

CELL RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 33-42

出版社

INST BIOCHEMISTRY & CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2012.1

关键词

public T cell response; convergent recombination; recombinatorial biases; thymic selection

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2009CB522200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30830092, 30921005, 91029304, 81061160512, 61174161]
  3. Sino-Swiss International Collaboration Grant [2009DFA32760]
  4. Science Planning Program of Fujian Province [2009J1010]
  5. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20090121110022]
  6. Xiamen University [2011121047, 201112G018, CXB2011035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Historically, sharing T cell receptors (TCRs) between individuals has been speculated to be impossible, considering the dramatic discrepancy between the potential enormity of the TCR repertoire and the limited number of T cells generated in each individual. However, public T cell response, in which multiple individuals share identical TCRs in responding to a same antigenic epitope, has been extensively observed in a variety of immune responses across many species. Public T cell responses enable individuals within a population to generate similar antigen-specific TCRs against certain ubiquitous pathogens, leading to favorable biological outcomes. However, the relatively concentrated feature of TCR repertoire may limit T cell response in a population to some other pathogens. It could be a great benefit for human health if public T cell responses can be manipulated. Therefore, the mechanistic insight of public TCR generation is important to know. Recently, high-throughput DNA sequencing has revolutionized the study of immune receptor repertoires, which allows a much better understanding of the factors that determine the overlap of TCR repertoire among individuals. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on public T-cell response and discuss future challenges in this field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据