4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Longitudinal effects of age at onset and first drinking situations on problem drinking

期刊

SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE
卷 38, 期 14, 页码 1983-2016

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1081/JA-120025123

关键词

drinking initiation context; first alcohol use; protective factors; risk factors

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA/AA 03395] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA003395] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to describe aspects of the first alcohol-use experience, and examine the predictive relations among age of first use, context of alcohol use initiation, and problem drinking with and without controls for psychosocial risk factors. Data were from the Rutgers Health and Human Development Project, a five-wave, prospective study of substance-use behaviors in a community sample. Respondents, who were first interviewed at age 12 (1979-81) and most recently at age 30 or 31 (1999-2000) (N=371), reported on their first drinking experience, and on a range of known risk factors for alcohol abuse. Most alcohol initiation occurred during a family gathering. Regardless of initiation context, youth who drank at an early age were more likely than youth who initiated later to become problem drinkers, although the risk was relatively greater for the youth who first drank outside a family gathering. Based on multivariate logistic regressions, feeling drunk at initiation was the only on,set-related variable significantly associated with problem drinking; other significant risks factors included male gender, delinquency, and family history of alcoholism. Because most initiation occurs at a family gathering, alcoholism prevention research may benefit from examining the role that drinking in family contexts could play with regard to socializing young drinkers to less risky drinking behaviors in adulthood. In particular, further research focusing on the subjective effects experienced by youth when they first drink may be merited.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据