4.8 Article

Reprogramming of ovine adult fibroblasts to pluripotency via drug-inducible expression of defined factors

期刊

CELL RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 600-608

出版社

INST BIOCHEMISTRY & CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2011.6

关键词

sheep; pluripotency; reprogram; iPS cells; embryonic stem cells

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China [2007CB947902, 2007CB948003, 2009CB941101, 2009CB940903]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30971682, 30901019, 31025016]
  3. Ministry of Agriculture [2009ZX08010-016B]
  4. National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 program) of China [2010AA100504]
  5. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX2-YW-R-223]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reprogramming of somatic cells in the enucleated egg made Dolly, the sheep, the first successfully cloned mammal in 1996. However, the mechanism of sheep somatic cell reprogramming has not yet been addressed. Moreover, sheep embryonic stem (ES) cells are still not available, which limits the generation of precise gene-modified sheep. In this study, we report that sheep somatic cells can be directly reprogrammed to induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells using defined factors (Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc, Klf4, Nanog, Lin28, SV40 large T and hTERT). Our observations indicated that somatic cells from sheep are more difficult to reprogram than somatic cells from other species, in which iPS cells have been reported. We demonstrated that sheep iPS cells express ES cell markers, including alkaline phosphatase, Oct4, Nanog, Sox2, Rex1, stage-specific embryonic antigen-1, TRA-1-60, TRA-1-81 and E-cadherin. Sheep iPS cells exhibited normal karyotypes and were able to differentiate into all three germ layers both in vitro and in teratomas. Our study may help to reveal the mechanism of somatic cell reprogramming in sheep and provide a platform to explore the culture conditions for sheep ES cells. Moreover, sheep iPS cells may be directly used to generate precise gene-modified sheep.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据