4.1 Article

A school-based screening program for fetal alcohol syndrome

期刊

NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 725-729

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ntt.2003.07.007

关键词

fetal alcohol syndrome; screening; diagnosis; schools; cost; prevalence

资金

  1. CSAP SAMHSA HHS [5KD1SP09199-02, 5KD1SP09199-01, 5KD1SP09199-03] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) is a common cause of birth defects and neuropsychiatric impairment. Identification of affected people is crucial for early entry into intervention programs and for the development of prevalence estimates. The objective of this project was to determine if screening for FAS in a community elementary school-based setting was feasible, to estimate prevalence in the screened population, and to determine if a screening program for FAS can be implemented using available personnel from the community. The FAS Screen was used to screen kindergarten students enrolled in a school system. Students with scores on the FAS Screen above the cutoff for a positive screen (20) were referred to one of several diagnostic clinics for evaluation. Over a 9-year period, 1384 students were screened and 69 (5%) had a positive screen (20 or above). These 69 children were then seen in a genetics/dysmorphology diagnostic clinic and 7 (10%) were found to have FAS (n = 6) or partial FAS (n = 1). The prevalence of affected children (FAS and partial FAS) was 1 per 198 students or 4.3 per 1000. The FAS Screen was completed annually by school staff, teachers, social workers, and psychologists. The test has acceptable epidemiologic performance characteristics in a community setting. The screening takes about 8-10 min. The procedure was well accepted in the community. This screening strategy was inexpensive to implement (less than US$8.00 per student), and can be easily included with the other screens completed at kindergarten entry. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据