4.8 Article

Blocking Lipid Synthesis Overcomes Tumor Regrowth and Metastasis after Antiangiogenic Therapy Withdrawal

期刊

CELL METABOLISM
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 280-294

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.05.022

关键词

-

资金

  1. Action de Recherche Concertee (ARC) (Universite de Liege) (Belgium)
  2. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS (F.R.S.-FNRS) (Belgium)
  3. Foundation against Cancer (foundation of public interest) (Belgium)
  4. Centre Anticancereux pres l'Universite de Liege (Belgium)
  5. Fonds Leon Fredericq (University of Liege) (Belgium)
  6. Direction Generale Operationnelle de l'Economie (Belgium)
  7. de l'Emploi et de la Recherche from the S.P.W. (Region Wallonne) (Belgium)
  8. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme - Belgian Science Policy (Belgium)
  9. F.R.S.-FNRS-Televie
  10. EU under REA grant CAFFEIN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular mechanisms responsible for the failure of antiangiogenic therapies and how tumors adapt to these therapies are unclear. Here, we applied transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches to preclinical models and provide evidence for tumor adaptation to vascular endothelial growth factor blockade through a metabolic shift toward carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in tumors. During sunitinib or sorafenib treatment, tumor growth was inhibited and tumors were hypoxic and glycolytic. In sharp contrast, treatment withdrawal led to tumor regrowth, angiogenesis restoration, moderate lactate production, and enhanced lipid synthesis. This metabolic shift was associated with a drastic increase in metastatic dissemination. Interestingly, pharmacological lipogenesis inhibition with orlistat or fatty acid synthase downregulation with shRNA inhibited tumor regrowth and metastases after sunitinib treatment withdrawal. Our data shed light on metabolic alterations that result in cancer adaptation to antiangiogenic treatments and identify key molecules involved in lipid metabolism as putative therapeutic targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据