4.7 Article

High-level sustained transgene expression in human embryonic stem cells using lentiviral vectors

期刊

STEM CELLS
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 111-117

出版社

ALPHAMED PRESS
DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.21-1-111

关键词

human embryonic stem cells; lentiviral vectors; scaffold attachment region; chromatin insulator

资金

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [R24RR016209] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL066305, R01HL065519] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCRR NIH HHS [R24 RR16209] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL66305, R01 HL65519] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we describe the sustained expression of transgenes introduced into human embryonic stem (ES) cells using self-inactivating lentiviral vectors. At low multiplicity of infection, vesicular stomatitis virus-pseudotyped vectors containing a green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgene under the control of a human elongation factor la promoter transduced human ES cells at high efficiency. The majority of the transduced ES cells, which harbored low numbers of integrated vectors, continued to express GFP after 60 days of culture. Incorporation of a scaffold attachment region (SAR) from the human interferon-P gene into the lentiviral vector backbone increased the average level of GFP expression, and inclusion of the SAR together with a chromatin insulator from the 5' end of the chicken beta-globin locus reduced the variability in GFP expression. When the transduced ES cells were induced to differentiate into CD34(+) hematopoietic precursors in vitro, GFP expression was maintained with minimal silencing. The ability to efficiently introduce active transgenes into human ES cells will facilitate gain-of-function studies of early developmental processes in the human system. These results also have important implications for the possible future use of gene-modified human ES cells in transplantation and tissue regeneration applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据