4.6 Article

Impact of impulsiveness, venturesomeness, and empathy on driving by older adults

期刊

JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 353-359

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.09.013

关键词

aging; driver behavior; personality; venturesomeness; impulsiveness

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R21-EY14071] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [P50-AG11684] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R21EY014071] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P50AG011684] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Problem: Although personality characteristics such as impulsiveness have been linked to the driving safety and driving habits of young and middle-aged adults, little research has focused on the role of personality in older driver behavior. Method: Using the IVE questionnaire in an exploratory study, three personality dimensions (impulsiveness, venturesomeness, and empathy) were measured in 305 older drivers (ages 57-87 years old). In addition, the Driving Habits Questionnaire was used to estimate driving exposure, and the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) was used to estimate driving errors and violations. State-recorded crash data were made available by the state public safety agency. Results: Subjects who reported four or more driving errors had higher impulsivity and empathy scores and lower venturesomeness scores. Subjects reporting driving violations were more likely to have high impulsivity scores. Driving six or more places per week was associated with lower levels of impulsivity. Impact: These results suggest that a comprehensive understanding of driving problems among older adults should also include a consideration of personality dimensions. In doing so, the challenges faced in the interpretation of self-report instruments on driving behaviors must be acknowledged, with a move in research toward greater reliance on more objective measures of driving behavior when assessing the impact of personality variables. (C) 2003 National Safety Council and Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据