4.8 Article

Dominant Role of the p110β Isoform of PI3K over p110α in Energy Homeostasis Regulation by POMC and AgRP Neurons

期刊

CELL METABOLISM
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 343-354

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.09.008

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  4. Diabetes UK
  5. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  6. Queen Mary University of London
  7. European Molecular Biology Organization [ALTF676-2005]
  8. Foundation pour la Recherche Medicale [FRMSPE20051105175]
  9. European Union Marie Curie [MEIF-CT-2006-039676]
  10. MRC [G0600866, MC_U120061305, G108/551, MC_U120097114] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Medical Research Council [G108/551, G0600866, MC_U120097114, G0700711B, MC_U120061305] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PI3K signaling is thought to mediate leptin and insulin action in hypothalamic pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) and agouti-related protein (AgRP) neurons, key regulators of energy homeostasis, through largely unknown mechanisms. We inactivated either p110 alpha or p110 beta PI3K catalytic subunits in these neurons and demonstrate a dominant role for the latter in energy homeostasis; regulation. In POMC neurons, p110 beta inactivation prevented insulin- and leptin-stimulated electrophysiological responses. POMCp110 beta null mice exhibited central leptin resistance, increased adiposity, and diet-induced obesity. In contrast, the response to leptin was not blocked in p110 alpha-deficient POMC neurons. Accordingly, POMCp110 alpha null mice displayed minimal energy homeostasis abnormalities. Similarly, in AgRP neurons, p110 beta had a more important role than p110 alpha. AgRPp110 alpha null mice displayed normal energy homeostasis regulation, whereas AgRPp110 beta null mice were lean, with increased leptin sensitivity and resistance to diet-induced obesity. These results demonstrate distinct metabolic roles for the p110 alpha and p110 beta isoforms; of PI3K in hypothalamic energy regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据