4.4 Article

Eyedrop-induced allergy: Clinical evaluation and diagnostic protocol

期刊

IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY AND IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 529-538

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1081/IPH-120026438

关键词

atropine sulfate; excipients; extemporaneous preparations; mydriatic eyedrops; phenylephrine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. In the last few years, adverse reactions to mydriatic eyedrops have been investigated. However, is not still available a standardized protocol, capable of identify the pathogenetic mechanism. In the light of these findings we have evaluated the reliability of a protocol with well established concentration of specific allergens. Methods. The diagnostic method includes the application of patch test series Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali (GIRDCA), medicaments, corticosteroids, local anesthetics, main eyedrops' excipients, pure active principles and extemporaneous preparations with mydriatic eyewashes. At the same time, skin prick test with a solution of atropine sulfate at 1% and an intradermal test with injection of atropine at 0.01% were carried out. Results. After patch tests were removed, we detected seven positiveness to the phenylephrine, two to the benzalkonium chloride, one to thiomersal, one to the ethylendiamine and one to the atropine sulfate 1%. With intradermal tests we obtained three positiveness in patients who reported adverse reactions to atropine. Conclusions. Our results show that phenylephrine is frequently responsible for allergic conjunctivitis (53.8%). In the case of atropine, even though the limited number of patients suggests to perform more extensive studies, it emerges that our diagnostic protocol is safe and might be able to screen allergic reactions in the field of ophthalmopathies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据