4.7 Article

The Autophagy Regulator Rubicon Is a Feedback Inhibitor of CARD9-Mediated Host Innate Immunity

期刊

CELL HOST & MICROBE
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 277-289

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.01.019

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea, the Hastings Foundation [CA82057, CA31363, CA115284, DE019085, AI073099, AI083025, HL110609, K20815000001]
  2. Hastings Foundation
  3. Fletcher Jones Foundation
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea
  5. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [2011-0014785]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0014785] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Assembly of a scaffold consisting of CARD9, BCL10, and MALT1 (CBM complex) is critical for effective signaling by multiple pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) including Dectin and RIG-I. The RUN domain Beclin-1-interacting cysteine-rich-containing Rubicon protein associates constitutively with the Beclin-UVRAG-Vps34 complex under normal conditions to regulate autophagy. Rubicon also interacts with the phagocytic NADPH-oxidase complex upon TLR stimulation to induce potent antimicrobial responses. Here, we show Rubicon is a physiological feedback inhibitor of CBM-mediated PRR signaling, preventing unbalanced proinflammatory responses. Upon Dectin-1- or RIG-I-mediated activation, Rubicon dynamically exchanges binding partners from 14-3-3 beta to CARD9 in a stimulation-specific and phosphorylation-dependent manner, disassembling the CBM signaling complex and ultimately terminating PRR-induced cytokine production. Remarkably, Rubicon's actions in the autophagy complex, phagocytosis complex, and CBM complex are functionally and genetically separable. Rubicon thus differentially targets signaling complexes, depending on environmental stimuli, and may function to coordinate various immune responses against microbial infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据