3.8 Article

Anomalous gadolinium, cerium, and yttrium contents in the adige and isarco river waters and in the water of their tributaries (Provinces Trento and Bolzano/Bozen, NE Italy)

期刊

ACTA HYDROCHIMICA ET HYDROBIOLOGICA
卷 31, 期 3, 页码 225-239

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aheh.200300492

关键词

Alps; Ce anomaly; Gd anomaly; Italy; rare earth elements; riverine water; groundwater

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rare earth patterns of surface and groundwaters near big cities often show anthropogenic Gd (Gd-ant) anomalies in addition to geogenic Ce and Y anomalies. The Gdant anomaly is caused by very stable organic complexes, one of which is gadopentetic acid, Gd-DTRA. Derivatives of this and similar compounds are used as contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the human blood system. The organic Gd complexes are stable enough to pass nearly unaffected through sewage treatment plants and are, thereafter, discharged into surface water systems. Water of the rapidly flowing Isarco/Eisack and Adige/Etsch rivers (Provinces of Trento and Bolzano/Bozen, NE Italy) and their tributaries show remarkable variations in anthropogenic Gd contents (Gd-ant). Low Gd-ant values are found on Monday and Tuesday, whereas high values are observed during the remaining weekdays. Reliable Gd-ant balances are calculated for the river system at the confluence of the Adige and its tributaries. At two places local decrease of Gd-ant indicates exfiltration of groundwater. It is demonstrated that Gd-ant can be used as a reliably conservative tracer to study the water budget in rapidly flowing alpine river systems. The studied different river waters show considerable negative Ce and positive Y anomalies. Negative Ce anomalies are caused by scavenging of Ce(III) by FeO(OH) precipitates and subsequent oxidation to CeO2.Y anomalies are attributed to less sorption of Y than REE onto particulate matter. Thus, Y moves faster than REE. Both, Ce and Y anomalies, are of geogenic origin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据