4.1 Article

Participation bias in longitudinal studies: experience from the Population Study of Women in Gothenburg, Sweden

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 242-247

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02813430310003309-1693

关键词

epidemiology; longitudinal data; participation; prospective studies; women

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-To describe a cohort study of women receiving a series of comprehensive health examinations over 32 years. Design-Longitudinal population study based on a randomised sample of the female population from defined age cohorts. Setting-City of Goteborg, Sweden. Subjects-Subjects were 38, 46, 50, 54 or 60 years old at the start of the study in 1968. Re-examinations were performed in 1974, 1982 and 1992. Non-participants in the most recent examination, initiated in 2000, were offered home visits. Main outcome measures-Participation, anthropometric and blood pressure changes. Results-At the end of the 32-year follow-up, 64% of the original participants were alive, and low participation among survivors was a problem. An acceptable participation rate (71% of those alive) was obtained after home visits were offered. Surviving non-participants already had elevated cardiovascular risk factors at onset of the study in 1968, along with lower educational level and lower socioeconomic status. Home visited subjects were similar to non-participants with regard to anthropometry and blood pressure, but did not differ from participants with regard to social indicators. Thirty-two-year longitudinal data demonstrate clear ageing effects for several important variables, which should, however, be considered in the context of documented differences with non-participants at the baseline examination. Conclusions-Longitudinal studies in elderly populations provide important data on changes during the ageing process. However, participation rates decline for a number of reasons and generalisations should be made with care. Moreover, including home visits in the protocol can both increase participation and reduce participation bias in elderly cohorts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据