期刊
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL
卷 132, 期 4, 页码 530-542出版社
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.530
关键词
-
资金
- NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH060637] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
- NIMH NIH HHS [MH60637] Funding Source: Medline
In contrast to the dominant discrepancy reduction model, which favors the most difficult items, people, given free choice, devoted most time to medium-difficulty items and studied the easiest items first. When study time was experimentally manipulated, best performance resulted when most time was given to the medium-difficulty items. Empirically determined information uptake functions revealed steep initial learning for easy items with little subsequent increase. For medium-difficulty items, initial gains were smaller but more sustained, suggesting that the strategy people had used, when given free choice, was largely appropriate. On the basis of the information uptake functions, a negative spacing effect was predicted and observed in the final experiment. Overall, the results favored the region of proximal learning framework.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据