4.7 Article

Upregulated sirtuin 1 by miRNA-34a is required for smooth muscle cell differentiation from pluripotent stem cells

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 1170-1180

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2014.206

关键词

-

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation [FS/09/044/28007, PG/11/40/28891, PG/13/45/30326]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91339102, 81270001, 81270180]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LR14H020001]
  4. National Institute of Health Research
  5. London Cardiovascular Biomedical Research Unit
  6. British Heart Foundation [PG/11/40/28891, PG/13/45/30326, FS/09/044/28007] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

microRNA-34a (miR-34a) and sirtuin 1 (SirT1) have been extensively studied in tumour biology and longevity/aging, but little is known about their functional roles in smooth muscle cell (SMC) differentiation from pluripotent stem cells. Using well-established SMC differentiation models, we have demonstrated that miR-34a has an important role in SMC differentiation from murine and human embryonic stem cells. Surprisingly, deacetylase sirtuin 1 (SirT1), one of the top predicted targets, was positively regulated by miR-34a during SMC differentiation. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that miR-34a promoted differentiating stem cells' arrest at G0/G1 phase and observed a significantly decreased incorporation of miR-34a and SirT1 RNA into Ago2-RISC complex upon SMC differentiation. Importantly, we have identified SirT1 as a transcriptional activator in the regulation of SMC gene programme. Finally, our data showed that SirT1 modulated the enrichment of H3K9 tri-methylation around the SMC gene-promoter regions. Taken together, our data reveal a specific regulatory pathway that miR-34a positively regulates its target gene SirT1 in a cellular context-dependent and sequence-specific manner and suggest a functional role for this pathway in SMC differentiation from stem cells in vitro and in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据