4.7 Article

Glucocorticoids promote structural and functional maturation of foetal cardiomyocytes: a role for PGC-1α

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 22, 期 7, 页码 1106-1116

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2014.181

关键词

-

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation studentship
  2. British Heart Foundation Fellowship Transition Award
  3. Medical Research Council studentship
  4. Early Career Researcher grant from the Society for Endocrinology
  5. British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence award
  6. Medical Research Council [1202042] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucocorticoid levels rise dramatically in late gestation to mature foetal organs in readiness for postnatal life. Immature heart function may compromise survival. Cardiomyocyte glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is required for the structural and functional maturation of the foetal heart in vivo, yet the molecular mechanisms are largely unknown. Here we asked if GR activation in foetal cardiomyocytes in vitro elicits similar maturational changes. We show that physiologically relevant glucocorticoid levels improve contractility of primary-mouse-foetal cardiomyocytes, promote Z-disc assembly and the appearance of mature myofibrils, and increase mitochondrial activity. Genes induced in vitro mimic those induced in vivo and include PGC-1 alpha, a critical regulator of cardiac mitochondrial capacity. SiRNA-mediated abrogation of the glucocorticoid induction of PGC-1 alpha in vitro abolished the effect of glucocorticoid on myofibril structure and mitochondrial oxygen consumption. Using RNA sequencing we identified a number of transcriptional regulators, including PGC-1 alpha, induced as primary targets of GR in foetal cardiomyocytes. These data demonstrate that PGC-1 alpha is a key mediator of glucocorticoid-induced maturation of foetal cardiomyocyte structure and identify other candidate transcriptional regulators that may play critical roles in the transition of the foetal to neonatal heart.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据