4.7 Article

Acidotoxicity and acid-sensing ion channels contribute to motoneuron degeneration

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 589-598

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2012.158

关键词

acidotoxicity; 5-(N,N-dimethyl) amiloride hydrochloride; motoneuron; neurodegeneration; SOD1 mouse

资金

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [08/IN1/1949]
  2. Health Research Board [HRA_POR/2011/108]
  3. Health Research Board (HRB) [HRA-POR-2011-108] Funding Source: Health Research Board (HRB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurological condition with no cure. Mitochondrial dysfunction, Ca2+ overloading and local hypoxic/ischemic environments have been implicated in the pathophysiology of ALS and are conditions that may initiate metabolic acidosis in the affected tissue. We tested the hypothesis that acidotoxicity and acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are involved in the pathophysiology of ALS. We found that motoneurons were selectively vulnerable to acidotoxicity in vitro, and that acidotoxicity was partially reduced in asic1a-deficient motoneuron cultures. Cross-breeding of SOD1(G93A) ALS mice with asic1a-deficient mice delayed the onset and progression of motor dysfunction in SOD1 mice. Interestingly, we also noted a strong increase in ASIC2 expression in motoneurons of SOD1 mice and sporadic ALS patients during disease progression. Pharmacological pan-inhibition of ASIC channels with the lipophilic amiloride derivative, 5-(N,N-dimethyl)-amiloride hydrochloride, potently protected cultured motoneurons against acidotoxicity, and, given post-symptom onset, significantly improved lifespan, motor performance and motoneuron survival in SOD1 mice. Together, our data provide strong evidence for the involvement of acidotoxicity and ASIC channels in motoneuron degeneration, and highlight the potential of ASIC inhibitors as a new treatment approach for ALS. Cell Death and Differentiation (2013) 20, 589-598; doi:10.1038/cdd.2012.158; published online 11 January 2013

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据